FireStream 9270 vs Quadro 5000M
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and Quadro 5000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and Quadro 5000M.
FireStream 9270
Quadro 5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5000M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro 5000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 60% more power consumption, than Quadro 5000M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9270 and Quadro 5000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro 5000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 345 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro 5000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 85% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 39% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Dota 2 is 29% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Fortnite is 57% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Minecraft is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 70% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in World of Tanks is 28% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro 5000M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi |
| Code name | RV770 | Fermi |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 27 July 2010 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 405 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 16.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 518.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |