FireStream 9370 vs Quadro 5000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9370 and Quadro 5000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9370 and Quadro 5000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9370
Quadro 5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5000M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro 5000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro 5000M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 5000M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro 5000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 420 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.
- FireStream 9370 and Quadro 5000M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 23% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9370 and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 16% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 29% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro 5000M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Cypress | Fermi |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 27 July 2010 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 405 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 16.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 518.4 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |