GRID K240Q vs Quadro 5000M
In this comparison between GRID K240Q and Quadro 5000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K240Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro 5000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K240Q
Quadro 5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro 5000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro 5000M.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 5000M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 5000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 340 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 5000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3800 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GRID K240Q and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| GRID K240Q and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K240Q and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GRID K240Q and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GRID K240Q and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GRID K240Q and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| GRID K240Q and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| GRID K240Q and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 2% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| GRID K240Q and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GRID K240Q and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 5% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro 5000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK104 | Fermi |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 27 July 2010 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 405 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 16.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 518.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |