HD Graphics 630 vs Quadro 5000M
When choosing between HD Graphics 630 and Quadro 5000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between HD Graphics 630 and Quadro 5000M.
HD Graphics 630
Quadro 5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5000M here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Quadro 5000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 5000M has 566% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- HD Graphics 630 has 62 GB more memory, than Quadro 5000M.
- HD Graphics 630 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5000M - in Mobile workstations.
- HD Graphics 630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro 5000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 5000M is 105 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 5000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| HD Graphics 630 and Quadro 5000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 47% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 630 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Dota 2 is 37% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Fortnite is 60% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 120% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Minecraft is 20% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 112% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in World of Tanks is 38% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 630 | Quadro 5000M | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Fermi |
| Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | Fermi |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 2017 | 27 July 2010 |
| Pipelines | 24 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 405 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 16.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 518.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |