Quadro 5000M vs Radeon Pro W5500M
In this comparison between Quadro 5000M and Radeon Pro W5500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 5000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro W5500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro W5500M
Quadro 5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 5000M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 5000M has 17% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
- Quadro 5000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 5000M.
- Quadro 5000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- Quadro 5000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- Quadro 5000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 10800 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 5000M and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 35% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 29% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 36% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 41% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 5000M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | Fermi | Navi 14 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 July 2010 | 10 February 2020 |
| Pipelines | 320 | 1408 |
| Core clock speed | 405 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1450 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 6,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.20 | 127.6 |
| Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |