Quadro 5000M vs Radeon R7 A360
When choosing between Quadro 5000M and Radeon R7 A360, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro 5000M and Radeon R7 A360.
Radeon R7 A360
Quadro 5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 5000M | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 5000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 A360 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro 5000M has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Quadro 5000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 5000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A360 is 320 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.
- Quadro 5000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A360 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 5000M is 1197 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 342% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A360 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Dota 2 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Fortnite is 250% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in World of Tanks is 156% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 5000M | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Fermi | Meso |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 July 2010 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 405 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.20 | 23.52 |
| Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 3.6 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |