Quadro 5000M vs Radeon R7 M365X
In this comparison between Quadro 5000M and Radeon R7 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 5000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M365X
Quadro 5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 5000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 5000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 5000M.
- Quadro 5000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Quadro 5000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 495 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.
- Quadro 5000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 5000M is 200 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Battlefield 5 is 228% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 69% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro 5000M and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Dota 2 is 68% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Fortnite is 115% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 257% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 5000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Fermi | Litho |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 July 2010 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 405 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.20 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |