Quadro 5000M vs Radeon R9 A375
In this comparison between Quadro 5000M and Radeon R9 A375 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 5000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 A375 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 A375
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro 5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 5000M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro 5000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro 5000M and Radeon R9 A375 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro 5000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 5000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 495 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.
- Quadro 5000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 5000M is 1196 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro 5000M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Dota 2 is 51% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Fortnite is 94% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 122% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Quadro 5000M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Fermi | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 July 2010 | no data |
Pipelines | 320 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 405 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 16.20 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
CUDA | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro 5000M vs FirePro M5100
- Quadro 5000M vs GeForce GTX 480M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs FirePro M5100
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce GTX 480M
- Quadro 5000M vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Quadro 5000M vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M