Quadro 5000M vs Radeon R9 M270X
When choosing between Quadro 5000M and Radeon R9 M270X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro 5000M and Radeon R9 M270X.
Radeon R9 M270X
Quadro 5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 5000M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro 5000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M270X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 5000M.
- Quadro 5000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Quadro 5000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 320 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.
- Quadro 5000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 5000M is 75 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 44% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 5000M and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Far Cry 5 is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Fortnite is 37% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 44% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
Quadro 5000M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Fermi | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 July 2010 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 320 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 405 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 16.20 | 31.00 |
Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |