FirePro M7740 vs Quadro 500M
When comparing FirePro M7740 and Quadro 500M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M7740 and Quadro 500M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 500M
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M7740 | Quadro 500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M7740 has 71% more power consumption, than Quadro 500M.
- FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro M7740 and Quadro 500M have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro 500M - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Quadro 500M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 500M is 50 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 and Quadro 500M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 500M is 800 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 242% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Dota 2 is 141% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Fortnite is 181% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Minecraft is 73% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 768p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | − |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Quadro 500M. |
Full Specs
FirePro M7740 | Quadro 500M | |
Architecture | Terascale 1 | Fermi |
Code name | RV740 | GF108 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 4 August 2009 | 22 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 700 MHz |
Transistor count | 826 million | 585 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 11.20 |
Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |