Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro 500M
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro 500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 500M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Quadro 500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Memory type | eDRAM | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 28% more power consumption, than Quadro 500M.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro 500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than Quadro 500M.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 500M - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro 500M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 500M is 500 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro 500M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 321% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 182% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 227% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 90% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 768p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than Quadro 500M. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Quadro 500M | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Fermi |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | GF108 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 22 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 40 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 700 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 392 million | 585 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 11.20 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |