Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro 500M
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro 500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics P580 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 500M
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Quadro 500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 500M has 133% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 63 GB more memory, than Quadro 500M.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 500M - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro 500M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 500M is 350 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 500M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 342% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 193% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 250% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Quadro 500M | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Fermi |
| Code name | Skylake GT4e | GF108 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 72 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 585 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 75.60 | 11.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Quadro 500M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Quadro 500M vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce 820A
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon R7 M340
- Quadro 500M vs GeForce 820A
- Quadro 500M vs Radeon R7 M340