Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro 500M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro 500M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Xe Graphics G7 stacks up against Quadro 500M, check out specs charts below.
Quadro 500M
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 | Quadro 500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
| Memory type | DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 500M - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Quadro 500M - with Fermi.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro 500M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro 500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 478% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro 500M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 265% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 377% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 | Quadro 500M | |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Fermi |
| Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | GF108 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 11.20 | |
| Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- Quadro 500M vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- Quadro 500M vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce 820A
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon R7 M340
- Quadro 500M vs GeForce 820A
- Quadro 500M vs Radeon R7 M340