Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro 500M

In this comparison between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro 500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs will be the best choice, for others Quadro 500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Check Price

Quadro 500M

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Laptops

Main Specs

	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Quadro 500M
Power consumption (TDP)		35 Watt
Interface		MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type		DDR3
Maximum RAM amount		1 GB
Display Connectors		No outputs
	Check Price

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Quadro 500M - in Desktops.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Quadro 500M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro 500M is 300 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro 500M - by 40 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	0−1
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
QHD / 1440p	8−9	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	40−45	1−2
medium / 1080p	27−30	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than Quadro 500M.
high / 1080p	35−40	−
ultra / 1080p	30−35	−
QHD / 1440p	14−16	0−1
4K / 2160p	9−10	−
low / 720p	70−75	0−1
medium / 1080p	40−45	−
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro 500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	60−65
medium / 768p	200−210	27−30
ultra / 1080p	120−130	7−8
QHD / 1440p	100−110	−
4K / 2160p	55−60	−
high / 768p	170−180	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 560% more, than Quadro 500M.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	55−60	0−1
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro 500M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	45−50
medium / 768p	110−120	10−11
ultra / 1080p	85−90	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Quadro 500M.
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	24−27	−
QHD / 1440p	20−22	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	55−60	0−1
medium / 1080p	30−33	−
high / 1080p	35−40	−
ultra / 1080p	27−30	−
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	130−140	21−24
medium / 1080p	75−80	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 513% more, than Quadro 500M.
high / 1080p	35−40	0−1
ultra / 1080p	27−30	−
QHD / 1440p	16−18	0−1
4K / 2160p	14−16	−
low / 720p	75−80	0−1
medium / 1080p	40−45	0−1
low / 768p	110−120	18−20
medium / 768p	95−100	−
high / 1080p	45−50	0−1
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
medium / 720p	−	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 505% more, than Quadro 500M.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	10−12	−
QHD / 1440p	10−12	−
4K / 2160p	3−4	−
low / 720p	40−45	0−1
medium / 1080p	20−22	−
low / 768p	120−130	75−80
high / 1080p	−	27−30
medium / 1080p	110−120	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 62% more, than Quadro 500M.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
low / 720p	75−80	8−9
medium / 1080p	18−20	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 862% more, than Quadro 500M.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	10−12	−
QHD / 1440p	3−4	−
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	40−45	0−1
medium / 1080p	21−24	−
low / 768p	80−85	0−1
medium / 768p	50−55	−
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	9−10	−
low / 768p	90−95	45−50
medium / 768p	60−65	14−16
ultra / 1080p	40−45	0−1
high / 768p	55−60	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro 500M.

Full Specs

	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Quadro 500M
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake	Fermi
Code name	Tiger Lake Xe	GF108
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	15 August 2020	22 February 2011
Pipelines	96	96
Core clock speed	400 MHz	700 MHz
Boost Clock	1350 MHz
Transistor count		585 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate		11.20
Floating-point performance		268.8 gflops
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth		28.8 GB/s
Shared memory	+
DirectX	DirectX 12_1	12 (11_0)
Shader Model		5.1
OpenGL		4.6
OpenCL		1.1
Vulkan		N/A
CUDA		2.1
Quick Sync	+
	Check Price

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro 500M

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares