Quadro 500M vs Quadro M2000M
In this comparison between Quadro 500M and Quadro M2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 500M will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 500M
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 500M | Quadro M2000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M2000M has 57% more power consumption, than Quadro 500M.
- Both video cards are using MXM-A (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro M2000M has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 500M.
- Quadro 500M is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro 500M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 338 MHz higher, than Quadro 500M.
- Quadro 500M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 3200 MHz higher, than Quadro 500M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | − | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 514% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
Quadro 500M and Quadro M2000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 422% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro 500M. |
Full Specs
Quadro 500M | Quadro M2000M | |
Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
Code name | GF108 | GM107 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 96 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 11.20 | 43.92 |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.1 | 5.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |