Quadro 500M vs Quadro M2200
In this comparison between Quadro 500M and Quadro M2200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 500M will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 500M
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro 500M | Quadro M2200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro M2200 has 57% more power consumption, than Quadro 500M.
- Quadro M2200 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 500M.
- Quadro 500M is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro 500M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 500M is 6 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro 500M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M2200 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 3708 MHz higher, than Quadro 500M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 500M and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | − | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 596% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
Quadro 500M and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 513% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 505% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 62% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 862% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro 500M. |
Full Specs
Quadro 500M | Quadro M2200 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
Code name | GF108 | N17P-Q3 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 13 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 96 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 694 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1870 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 11.20 | |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5508 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |