Quadro 500M vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When comparing Quadro 500M and Radeon PRO WX 2100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 500M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 500M
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
Quadro 500M | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 35 Watt.
- Quadro 500M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 500M.
- Quadro 500M is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro 500M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- Quadro 500M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4200 MHz higher, than Quadro 500M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 158% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 204% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Quadro 500M. |
Full Specs
Quadro 500M | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Polaris |
Code name | GF108 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 21 March 2018 |
Pipelines | 96 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 11.20 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |