Quadro 500M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro 500M and Radeon Pro WX 3200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro 500M and Radeon Pro WX 3200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro 500M
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro 500M | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 85% more power consumption, than Quadro 500M.
- Quadro 500M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 500M.
- Quadro 500M is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro 500M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 382 MHz higher, than Quadro 500M.
- Quadro 500M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 4200 MHz higher, than Quadro 500M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 231% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 318% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | − | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Quadro 500M. |
Full Specs
Quadro 500M | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Polaris |
Code name | GF108 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 26 September 2019 |
Pipelines | 96 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 1082 MHz |
Transistor count | 585 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 11.20 | 41.44 |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |