Quadro 500M vs Radeon R7 A265
When comparing Quadro 500M and Radeon R7 A265, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 500M and Radeon R7 A265 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 500M
Radeon R7 A265
Main Specs
Quadro 500M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Quadro 500M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 A265 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 500M.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro 500M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 25 MHz higher, than Quadro 500M.
- Quadro 500M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A265 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 500M and Radeon R7 A265 is 1800 MHz.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 500M and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Quadro 500M and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Fortnite is 113% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Minecraft is 35% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | − | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Quadro 500M. |
Full Specs
Quadro 500M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GF108 | Opal |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 11.20 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Similar compares
- Quadro 500M vs GeForce 820A
- Quadro 500M vs Radeon R7 M340
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce 820A
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R7 M340
- Quadro 500M vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Quadro 500M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics