Quadro 500M vs Radeon R9 A375
In this comparison between Quadro 500M and Radeon R9 A375 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 500M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 A375 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 500M
Radeon R9 A375
Main Specs
Quadro 500M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Quadro 500M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 A375 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 500M.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro 500M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro 500M.
- Quadro 500M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 500M is 1796 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Dota 2 is 113% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Minecraft is 60% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in World of Tanks is 92% more, than Quadro 500M. |
Full Specs
Quadro 500M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GF108 | Venus |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | no data |
Pipelines | 96 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 11.20 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Similar compares
- Quadro 500M vs GeForce 820A
- Quadro 500M vs Radeon R7 M340
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce 820A
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon R7 M340
- Quadro 500M vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Quadro 500M vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M