Quadro 500M vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
In this comparison between Quadro 500M and Radeon RX 460 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 500M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 460 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 500M
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro 500M | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon RX 460 mobile has 57% more power consumption, than Quadro 500M.
- Quadro 500M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 500M.
- Quadro 500M is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - in Laptops.
- Quadro 500M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
- Quadro 500M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 4200 MHz higher, than Quadro 500M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 500M and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 489% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
Quadro 500M and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Fortnite is 377% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro 500M. |
Full Specs
Quadro 500M | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
Architecture | Fermi | Polaris |
Code name | GF108 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 8 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 96 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 11.20 | 66.08 |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | 2,115 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |