FirePro S9000 vs Quadro 5010M
When choosing between FirePro S9000 and Quadro 5010M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S9000 and Quadro 5010M.
FirePro S9000
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Quadro 5010M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 ECC |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 250% more power consumption, than Quadro 5010M.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 5010M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 5010M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5010M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro 5010M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 450 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 5010M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 4200 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 223% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 191% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Quadro 5010M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Tahiti | N12E-Q5 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 21.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |