FirePro V5800 vs Quadro 5010M
In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and Quadro 5010M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 5010M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro V5800
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro 5010M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 ECC |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 5010M has 35% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 5010M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 5010M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5010M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro 5010M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 240 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- FirePro V5800 and Quadro 5010M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2700 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Battlefield 5 is 61% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Dota 2 is 27% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Fortnite is 34% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Grand Theft Auto V is 35% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Minecraft is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 44% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 53% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in World of Tanks is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro 5010M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Juniper | N12E-Q5 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 21.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |