FirePro W8000 vs Quadro 5010M

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W8000 and Quadro 5010M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W8000 and Quadro 5010M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

FirePro W8000 Check Price

Quadro 5010M Check Price

Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:

Quadro 5010M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W8000	Quadro 5010M
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	100 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5 ECC
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W8000 has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro 5010M.
FirePro W8000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 5010M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
FirePro W8000 and Quadro 5010M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
FirePro W8000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5010M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W8000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro 5010M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro W8000 is 450 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
FirePro W8000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 5010M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W8000 is 4200 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	9−10
ultra / 1080p	10−11	6−7
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	21−24
medium / 1080p	21−24	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 75% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	27−30	16−18
ultra / 1080p	24−27	14−16
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 720p	60−65	35−40
medium / 1080p	30−35	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Battlefield 5 is 76% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	50−55	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	220−230	160−170
medium / 768p	190−200	130−140
ultra / 1080p	100−110	70−75
QHD / 1440p	65−70	40−45
4K / 2160p	35−40	30−33
high / 768p	150−160	100−110
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	45−50	27−30
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	110−120	90−95
medium / 768p	100−110	70−75
ultra / 1080p	70−75	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	21−24	10−12
ultra / 1080p	18−20	10−11
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	4−5
low / 720p	45−50	24−27
medium / 1080p	21−24	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Far Cry 5 is 91% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	27−30	18−20
ultra / 1080p	21−24	12−14
QHD / 1440p	14−16	−
low / 720p	110−120	75−80
medium / 1080p	60−65	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Fortnite is 62% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	30−33	16−18
ultra / 1080p	21−24	14−16
QHD / 1440p	10−12	4−5
low / 720p	60−65	35−40
medium / 1080p	30−35	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	95−100	65−70
medium / 768p	85−90	55−60
high / 1080p	35−40	18−20
ultra / 1080p	14−16	8−9
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	10−12	6−7
ultra / 1080p	8−9	5−6
4K / 2160p	2−3	1−2
low / 720p	35−40	18−20
medium / 1080p	14−16	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	−	90−95
medium / 1080p	110−120	95−100
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	65−70	40−45
medium / 1080p	18−20	20−22
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	14−16	12−14
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	18−20
medium / 1080p	18−20	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 46% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	65−70	35−40
medium / 768p	40−45	21−24
high / 1080p	21−24	12−14
ultra / 1080p	12−14	8−9
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	50−55
ultra / 1080p	35−40	24−27
high / 768p	55−60	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Quadro 5010M.

Full Specs

	FirePro W8000	Quadro 5010M
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Code name	Tahiti	N12E-Q5
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	14 June 2012	22 February 2011
Pipelines	1792	384
Core clock speed	900 MHz	450 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	21.60
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	691.2 gflops
Length	279 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth	176 GB/s	83.2 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	391 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W8000 vs Quadro 5010M

Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares