GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro 5010M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro 5010M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro 5010M.
GeForce GTX 760A
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro 5010M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 ECC |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 5010M has 81% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 5010M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 5010M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5010M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 5010M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 178 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 5010M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 2708 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Fortnite is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro 5010M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK106 | N12E-Q5 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 21.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |