GRID K140Q vs Quadro 5010M
When choosing between GRID K140Q and Quadro 5010M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K140Q and Quadro 5010M.
GRID K140Q
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Quadro 5010M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 ECC |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 30% more power consumption, than Quadro 5010M.
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 5010M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 5010M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5010M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 5010M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 5010M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K140Q is 482 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Battlefield 5 is 475% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Dota 2 is 79% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Fortnite is 150% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 62% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1800% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1150% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in World of Tanks is 55% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Quadro 5010M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK107 | N12E-Q5 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 21.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |