GRID K520 vs Quadro 5010M
In this comparison between GRID K520 and Quadro 5010M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K520 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 5010M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K520
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
GRID K520 | Quadro 5010M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 ECC |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro 5010M.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 5010M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID K520 and Quadro 5010M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5010M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 5010M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 295 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 5010M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3700 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 57% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K520 and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 51% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 22% more, than Quadro 5010M. |
Full Specs
GRID K520 | Quadro 5010M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK104 | N12E-Q5 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 22 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 450 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 21.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 3.0 | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |