GRID M60 2Q vs Quadro 5010M
In this comparison between GRID M60 2Q and Quadro 5010M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 2Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro 5010M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 2Q
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Quadro 5010M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 ECC |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro 5010M.
- GRID M60 2Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 5010M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 5010M has 2 GB more memory, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GRID M60 2Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5010M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro 5010M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 107 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- GRID M60 2Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 5010M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 3712 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 223% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 191% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro 5010M. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Quadro 5010M | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GM204 | N12E-Q5 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 22 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 450 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 21.60 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.2 | 2.0 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |