Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro 5010M
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro 5010M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro 5010M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro 5010M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro 5010M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 or Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Quadro 5010M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5 ECC
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 5010M has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 5010M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 28 GB more memory, than Quadro 5010M.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 5010M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro 5010M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro 5010M is 150 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 5010M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
9−10
ultra / 1080p
5−6
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−11
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
35−40
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Battlefield 5 is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
150−160
160−170
medium / 768p
120−130
130−140
ultra / 1080p
60−65
70−75
QHD / 1440p
35−40
40−45
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
90−95
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
65−70
70−75
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
10−11
10−12
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
24−27
medium / 1080p
10−11
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
65−70
75−80
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Fortnite is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
60−65
65−70
medium / 768p
50−55
55−60
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
5−6
6−7
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
14−16
18−20
medium / 1080p
7−8
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
90−95
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
18−20
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
18−20
medium / 1080p
12−14
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
30−35
35−40
medium / 768p
20−22
21−24
high / 1080p
10−12
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
50−55
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
high / 768p
40−45
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Quadro 5010M
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Fermi
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
N12E-Q5
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
3 January 2017
22 February 2011
Pipelines
48
384
Core clock speed
300 MHz
450 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
55.20
21.60
Floating-point performance
883 gflops
691.2 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.103
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price