Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro 5010M
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro 5010M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro 5010M.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro 5010M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro 5010M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 or Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Quadro 5010M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
GDDR5 ECC
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 5010M has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 5010M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 5010M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro 5010M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro 5010M is 150 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 5010M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
9−10
ultra / 1080p
7−8
6−7
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
21−24
medium / 1080p
16−18
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
45−50
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
190−200
160−170
medium / 768p
160−170
130−140
ultra / 1080p
85−90
70−75
QHD / 1440p
45−50
40−45
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−33
high / 768p
120−130
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
85−90
70−75
ultra / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p
14−16
10−12
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−11
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
16−18
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p
21−24
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
85−90
75−80
medium / 1080p
45−50
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 22% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
QHD / 1440p
7−8
4−5
low / 720p
45−50
35−40
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p
75−80
65−70
medium / 768p
65−70
55−60
high / 1080p
24−27
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p
8−9
6−7
ultra / 1080p
6−7
5−6
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−12
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
95−100
90−95
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p
21−24
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
40−45
medium / 1080p
21−24
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
14−16
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p
45−50
35−40
medium / 768p
27−30
21−24
high / 1080p
16−18
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 29% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
50−55
ultra / 1080p
30−35
24−27
high / 768p
50−55
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than Quadro 5010M.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Quadro 5010M
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Fermi
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
N12E-Q5
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 September 2017
22 February 2011
Pipelines
48
384
Core clock speed
300 MHz
450 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
21.60
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.103
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
