Quadro 2000D vs Quadro 5010M
In this comparison between Quadro 2000D and Quadro 5010M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000D will be the best choice, for others Quadro 5010M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000D
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Quadro 5010M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 ECC |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 5010M has 61% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 5010M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 5010M has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5010M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro 2000D and Quadro 5010M are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 175 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- Quadro 2000D and Quadro 5010M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 1300 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro 2000D and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Fortnite is 84% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Forza Horizon 4 is 111% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Minecraft is 16% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Quadro 5010M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | GF106 | N12E-Q5 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 5 October 2011 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 21.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |