Quadro 5010M vs Radeon HD 7670A
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro 5010M and Radeon HD 7670A. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro 5010M and Radeon HD 7670A. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 7670A
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 ECC | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 5010M has 122% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Quadro 5010M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon HD 7670A uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 5010M has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Quadro 5010M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 7670A - in Desktops.
- Quadro 5010M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon HD 7670A - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7670A is 150 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- Quadro 5010M and Radeon HD 7670A are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7670A is 2700 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 5010M and Radeon HD 7670A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Dota 2 is 37% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Fortnite is 84% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Minecraft is 15% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 7670A | |
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | N12E-Q5 | Turks |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 5 January 2012 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 14.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1300 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |