Quadro 5010M vs Radeon R7 260

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro 5010M and Radeon R7 260, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro 5010M stacks up against Radeon R7 260, check out specs charts below.

Quadro 5010M Check Price

Radeon R7 260 Check Price

Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:

Quadro 5010M Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro 5010M	Radeon R7 260
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5 ECC	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 260 has 15% more power consumption, than Quadro 5010M.
Quadro 5010M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 260 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro 5010M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 260.
Quadro 5010M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 260 - in Desktops.
Quadro 5010M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 260 - with GCN 2.0.
Quadro 5010M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 260 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 260 is 325 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	9−10	14−16
ultra / 1080p	6−7	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	21−24	30−35
medium / 1080p	12−14	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	16−18	24−27
ultra / 1080p	14−16	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	35−40	50−55
medium / 1080p	16−18	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Battlefield 5 is 47% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro 5010M and Radeon R7 260 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	160−170	200−210
medium / 768p	130−140	170−180
ultra / 1080p	70−75	95−100
QHD / 1440p	40−45	50−55
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−33
high / 768p	100−110	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
medium / 768p	70−75	90−95
ultra / 1080p	45−50	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Dota 2 is 28% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	10−12	16−18
ultra / 1080p	10−11	16−18
4K / 2160p	4−5	6−7
low / 720p	24−27	35−40
medium / 1080p	12−14	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Far Cry 5 is 58% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	18−20	24−27
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	75−80	95−100
medium / 1080p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Fortnite is 37% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	16−18	24−27
ultra / 1080p	14−16	20−22
QHD / 1440p	4−5	9−10
low / 720p	35−40	50−55
medium / 1080p	18−20	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	65−70	85−90
medium / 768p	55−60	75−80
high / 1080p	18−20	27−30
ultra / 1080p	8−9	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	6−7	9−10
ultra / 1080p	5−6	7−8
4K / 2160p	1−2	2−3
low / 720p	18−20	27−30
medium / 1080p	8−9	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	90−95	100−110
medium / 1080p	95−100	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	40−45	55−60
medium / 1080p	20−22	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	27−30
medium / 1080p	12−14	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	35−40	50−55
medium / 768p	21−24	30−35
high / 1080p	12−14	18−20
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−12
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 41% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
medium / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	24−27	35−40
high / 768p	40−45	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Quadro 5010M.

Full Specs

	Quadro 5010M	Radeon R7 260
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 2.0
Code name	N12E-Q5	Bonaire
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	22 February 2011	17 December 2013
Pipelines	384	768
Core clock speed	450 MHz
Boost Clock		1100 MHz
Transistor count	3,000 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	21.60	48.00
Floating-point performance	691.2 gflops	1,536 gflops
Length		170 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1300 MHz	1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth	83.2 GB/s	104 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A
CUDA	2.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		240 Mh/s
Laptop size	large
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DisplayPort support		+
DDMA audio		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 5010M vs Radeon R7 260

Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares