Quadro 5010M vs Tesla C2070
When comparing Quadro 5010M and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 5010M and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 5010M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 ECC | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 138% more power consumption, than Quadro 5010M.
- Quadro 5010M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 5010M.
- Quadro 5010M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 5010M and Tesla C2070 are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 124 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- Quadro 5010M and Tesla C2070 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1688 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 54% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 5010M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | N12E-Q5 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1300 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |