Quadro 5010M vs Tesla M6
In this comparison between Quadro 5010M and Tesla M6 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 5010M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M6 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M6
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 5010M | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 ECC | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 100 Watt.
- Quadro 5010M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro 5010M.
- Quadro 5010M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 5010M is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 480 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- Quadro 5010M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla M6 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 3712 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 100% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 214% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 283% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 157% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 337% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 207% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 294% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 5010M | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N12E-Q5 | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1300 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | 5.2 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |