Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro 6000
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro 6000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro 6000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Quadro 6000
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
204 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 6000 has 1260% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 6000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 26 GB more memory, than Quadro 6000.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 6000 - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro 6000 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro 6000 is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 6000 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
14−16
ultra / 1080p
5−6
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
18−20
27−30
medium / 1080p
10−11
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 70% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
30−33
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro 6000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
150−160
200−210
medium / 768p
120−130
170−180
ultra / 1080p
60−65
90−95
QHD / 1440p
35−40
50−55
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
90−95
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
medium / 768p
65−70
90−95
ultra / 1080p
40−45
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
14−16
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−11
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
16−18
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
65−70
90−95
medium / 1080p
27−30
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Fortnite is 48% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
2−3
8−9
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 56% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
60−65
80−85
medium / 768p
50−55
70−75
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 41% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
5−6
9−10
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
27−30
medium / 1080p
7−8
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
100−110
medium / 1080p
95−100
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Minecraft is 14% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
35−40
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
24−27
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
30−35
50−55
medium / 768p
20−22
30−35
high / 1080p
10−12
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
90−95
100−105
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
high / 768p
40−45
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Quadro 6000
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Fermi
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GF100
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
3 January 2017
10 December 2010
Pipelines
48
448
Core clock speed
300 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
55.20
32.14
Floating-point performance
883 gflops
1,027.7 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
2988 MHz
Memory bandwidth
143.4 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.103
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
91 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
