NVS 510 vs Quadro 6000

When choosing between NVS 510 and Quadro 6000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between NVS 510 and Quadro 6000.

NVS 510 Check Price

Quadro 6000 Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro 6000
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	204 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 6000 has 482% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro 6000 has 4 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 6000 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 223 MHz higher, than Quadro 6000.
NVS 510 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 6000 - by 40 nm process technology.
Quadro 6000 is 88 mm longer, than NVS 510.
Memory clock speed of Quadro 6000 is 1206 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	1−2	27−30
medium / 1080p	0−1	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 6000.
low / 768p	60−65	200−210
medium / 768p	27−30	170−180
ultra / 1080p	7−8	90−95
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	−	30−33
high / 768p	16−18	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro 6000.
low / 768p	45−50	100−110
medium / 768p	10−11	90−95
ultra / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Dota 2 is 237% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	90−95
medium / 1080p	0−1	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Fortnite is 318% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	0−1	27−30
low / 768p	18−20	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Minecraft is 49% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 720p	8−9	50−55
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	0−1	50−55
medium / 768p	−	30−35
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 768p	45−50	100−105
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	30−35
high / 768p	12−14	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro 6000
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Code name	GK107	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	10 December 2010
Pipelines	192	448
Core clock speed	797 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	32.14
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops	1,027.7 gflops
Length	160 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	2988 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	143.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	3.0	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s	91 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Quadro 6000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares