FirePro M4100 vs Quadro 7000
In this comparison between FirePro M4100 and Quadro 7000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4100 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 7000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 7000
FirePro M4100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4100 | Quadro 7000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 204 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro 7000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro 7000 has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro M4100.
- FirePro M4100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro 7000 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4100 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro 7000 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4100 is 19 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
- FirePro M4100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 7000 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4100 is 596 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Dota 2 is 90% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 200% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 360% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 414% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than FirePro M4100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4100 | Quadro 7000 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Mars | GF110 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 2 May 2012 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 670 MHz | 651 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.08 | 41.66 |
| Floating-point performance | 514.6 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3404 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 163.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 74 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |