FirePro M5950 vs Quadro 7000
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M5950 and Quadro 7000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M5950 and Quadro 7000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro 7000
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Quadro 7000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 has 482% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro 7000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro 7000 has 5 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro 7000 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Quadro 7000 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 74 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
- FirePro M5950 and Quadro 7000 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 7000 is 2504 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 214% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Dota 2 is 83% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 140% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 190% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 136% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 175% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in World of Tanks is 44% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Quadro 7000 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | GF110 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 2 May 2012 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 651 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 41.66 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 3404 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 163.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |