GeForce GTS 160M vs Quadro 7000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro 7000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTS 160M stacks up against Quadro 7000, check out specs charts below.
Quadro 7000
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M | Quadro 7000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 204 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 has 240% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro 7000 has 5 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Quadro 7000 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Quadro 7000 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 849 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
- GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro 7000 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 507% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro 7000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 422% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M | Quadro 7000 | |
Architecture | G9x | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | N10E-GS1 | GF110 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 2 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 64 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 651 MHz |
Transistor count | 505 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19 billion/sec | 41.66 |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51 GB/s | 163.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 288 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |