Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro 7000
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro 7000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 640 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 7000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 7000
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Quadro 7000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 204 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 has 1260% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 7000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 26 GB more memory, than Quadro 7000.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 7000 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro 7000 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 7000 is 351 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 7000 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 144% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 79% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 111% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 146% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 103% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Minecraft is 21% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Quadro 7000 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GF110 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 2 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 48 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 651 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 41.66 |
Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 163.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Quadro 7000 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Quadro 7000 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro M2000M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Tesla M10
- Quadro 7000 vs Quadro M2000M
- Quadro 7000 vs Tesla M10