Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro 7000
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro 7000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro 7000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro 7000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Quadro 7000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 204 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 has 353% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro 7000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 122 GB more memory, than Quadro 7000.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 7000 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro 7000 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 7000 is 451 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro 7000 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 47% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 67% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 88% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Quadro 7000 | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | GF110 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 2 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 40 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 651 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 392 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 41.66 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 163.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |