Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro 7000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro 7000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 stacks up against Quadro 7000, check out specs charts below.
Quadro 7000
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Quadro 7000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 204 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 has 1260% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro 7000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 7000 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro 7000 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 7000 is 351 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 7000 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 127% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Far Cry 5 is 242% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 223% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 187% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Quadro 7000 | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | GF110 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 June 2015 | 2 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 48 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 651 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 41.66 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 163.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |