Quadro 7000 vs Quadro FX 3800
When comparing Quadro 7000 and Quadro FX 3800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 7000 and Quadro FX 3800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 7000
Quadro FX 3800
Main Specs
| Quadro 7000 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 204 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
- Quadro 7000 has 88% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro 7000 has 5 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro 7000 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 7000 is 51 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro 7000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Quadro 7000 is 50 mm longer, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 7000 is 1804 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Battlefield 5 is 900% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Dota 2 is 136% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Far Cry 5 is 933% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 282% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Metro Exodus is 3600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 106% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1750% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 7000 | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF110 | GT200B |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 May 2012 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 651 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 41.66 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | 198 mm |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 163.4 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | 1.3 |