Quadro 7000 vs Quadro K5100M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro 7000 and Quadro K5100M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro 7000 stacks up against Quadro K5100M, check out specs charts below.
Quadro 7000
Quadro K5100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 7000 | Quadro K5100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 204 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 has 104% more power consumption, than Quadro K5100M.
- Quadro 7000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K5100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K5100M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 7000.
- Quadro 7000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5100M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro 7000 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K5100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K5100M is 120 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
- Quadro 7000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K5100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K5100M is 196 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 14% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| Quadro 7000 and Quadro K5100M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 17% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 7000 | Quadro K5100M | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GF110 | N15E-Q5-A2 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 2 May 2012 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 651 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 41.66 | 98.69 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops | 2,369 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 163.4 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 35 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |