Quadro 7000 vs Radeon Pro 5500M
When choosing between Quadro 7000 and Radeon Pro 5500M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro 7000 and Radeon Pro 5500M.
Quadro 7000
Radeon Pro 5500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5500M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 7000 | Radeon Pro 5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 204 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 has 140% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 5500M.
- Quadro 7000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 5500M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 7000.
- Quadro 7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 5500M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro 7000 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 5500M - with Navi / RDNA.
- Quadro 7000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5500M is 8596 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 7000 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Quadro 7000 and Radeon Pro 5500M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Fortnite is 81% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5500M in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Quadro 7000. |
Full Specs
Quadro 7000 | Radeon Pro 5500M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Navi / RDNA |
Code name | GF110 | Navi 14 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 2 May 2012 | 13 November 2019 |
Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 651 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 41.66 | 139.2 |
Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 163.4 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |