Quadro 7000 vs Radeon R7 M270
When comparing Quadro 7000 and Radeon R7 M270, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 7000 and Radeon R7 M270 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 7000
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
Quadro 7000 | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 204 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro 7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M270 - in Laptops.
- Quadro 7000 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270 is 174 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
- Quadro 7000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | − |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | − |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 507% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Quadro 7000 and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 422% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
low / 768p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon R7 M270. |
Full Specs
Quadro 7000 | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GF110 | Opal XT / Mars |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 2 May 2012 | 7 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 651 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 41.66 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 163.4 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |