Quadro 7000 vs Radeon R7 M465
In this comparison between Quadro 7000 and Radeon R7 M465 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 7000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M465 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 7000
Radeon R7 M465 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M465 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M465 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 7000 | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 204 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M465 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro 7000 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465.
- Quadro 7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M465 - in Laptops.
- Quadro 7000 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M465 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 174 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
- Quadro 7000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M465 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 596 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 128% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 208% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 185% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 7000 | Radeon R7 M465 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GF110 | Litho XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 2 May 2012 | 1 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 651 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 41.66 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 163.4 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |