Quadro 7000 vs Radeon R9 M395X
When comparing Quadro 7000 and Radeon R9 M395X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 7000 and Radeon R9 M395X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 7000
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
Quadro 7000 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 204 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 22% more power consumption, than Quadro 7000.
- Quadro 7000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M395X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro 7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- Quadro 7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- Quadro 7000 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395X is 72 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
- Quadro 7000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M395X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 7000 is 2154 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 7000 and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Quadro 7000 and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 34% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 33% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Quadro 7000. |
Full Specs
Quadro 7000 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 3 |
Code name | GF110 | Amethyst XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 2 May 2012 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 512 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 651 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 41.66 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 163.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 413 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |