Quadro 7000 vs Tesla C2070
When choosing between Quadro 7000 and Tesla C2070, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro 7000 and Tesla C2070.
Quadro 7000
Tesla C2070
Main Specs
Quadro 7000 | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 204 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI |
- Tesla C2070 has 16% more power consumption, than Quadro 7000.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro 7000 and Tesla C2070 have maximum RAM of 6 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro 7000 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 7000 is 77 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Quadro 7000 and Tesla C2070 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Both graphics cards are the same length of 248 mm.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 7000 is 416 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 1% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
Quadro 7000 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
Quadro 7000 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Quadro 7000 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
Quadro 7000 | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GF110 | GF100 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 May 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 651 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 41.66 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | 248 mm |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 163.4 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | 2.0 |